Bail under 323,308,427 and 34 of IPC

Two applications arising out of common FIR.

Our learned counsel of the firm submitted that accused were falsely implicated in the case and has been custody for a months. It was the accused who were hit by auto-rickshaw  of the complainant. Co-accused was already granted bail and there are no specific allegations and accused were arrested on the basis of doubt and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicants.

Learned prosecutor opposed the application that TSR has been touched and all the boys have beaten them with fist blows and stones.

ADJ Atul Kumar Garg considered the role of the applicants that the incident occured due to over-touching of the TSR while the complainant was going to unloading of the wheat and the fact that co-accused has been granted bail and accused persons has been in judicial custody for a months.

That ADJ Atul Kumar Garg ordered that the bail shall be granted on personal bond Rs. 50,000/- each along with two sureties subject to conditions that accused persons shall attend court in accordance of bond executed, shall not temper evidence or induce or threaten, coerce or influence the witness, including complainant and the accused persons shall not commit any offence and shall comply social distancing norms and keep face covered.

The original order is attached:

State vs Rohit and Sagar

Leave A Reply

  • C-23, Hauz khas, New delhi-110016
  • +919560838391/9311503867